Comments on: Blogging and the Sexes: Blogging Style http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/21/blogging-and-the-sexes-blogging-style/ A theology and culture blog with the Bible in one tab and a news feed in the other. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:53:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Ed http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/21/blogging-and-the-sexes-blogging-style/#comment-212 Ed Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:44:41 +0000 #comment-212 Sorry Jamie. I did not intend to take away from your post, though I think I have. The way I read your comment I was afraid that readers could get lost in disagreeing about your comment about feminism:<br /> <br /> "the slant in feminism and sexism tends to lean to man being ignorant towards this "powerful woman-being" who goes unnoticed,"<br /> <br /> and only reply to that without interacting with some of the topics that I really think we all need to deal with. <br /> <br /> My point was that you had just touched on feminism briefly in the midst of a much longer post on seeking the humility that comes from God in the midst of gender issues. What you had to say definitely had implications on feminism. I just didn't want your excellent comment to get sidetracked on how you defined feminism. That's it.<br /> <br /> You're right though, I was trying to steer the conversation a bit too much and definitely overstated what I had intended, and even what I had intended was not quite on target. Sorry Jamie. I did not intend to take away from your post, though I think I have. The way I read your comment I was afraid that readers could get lost in disagreeing about your comment about feminism:

"the slant in feminism and sexism tends to lean to man being ignorant towards this "powerful woman-being" who goes unnoticed,"

and only reply to that without interacting with some of the topics that I really think we all need to deal with.

My point was that you had just touched on feminism briefly in the midst of a much longer post on seeking the humility that comes from God in the midst of gender issues. What you had to say definitely had implications on feminism. I just didn’t want your excellent comment to get sidetracked on how you defined feminism. That’s it.

You’re right though, I was trying to steer the conversation a bit too much and definitely overstated what I had intended, and even what I had intended was not quite on target.

]]> By: Jamie Davidson http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/21/blogging-and-the-sexes-blogging-style/#comment-211 Jamie Davidson Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:21:59 +0000 #comment-211 i wish you would have left my thoughts be my thoughts without feeling like you needed to explain them to be less offensive...i didn't treat my sexism comments as footnotes, but what i actually think about it. i wish you would have left my thoughts be my thoughts without feeling like you needed to explain them to be less offensive…i didn’t treat my sexism comments as footnotes, but what i actually think about it.

]]>