<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colbert on Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/</link>
	<description>A theology and culture blog with the Bible in one tab and a news feed in the other.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Davidson</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I'm frustrated with why the human heart is so drawn to coming up with something that feels right, such as the Pharisees with legalism,  trying to &#34;master&#34; theology, being extremely philanthropic etc.  Instead we should desire knowing Him, through a Spirit He gave that doesn't destort things but lives in truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m frustrated with why the human heart is so drawn to coming up with something that feels right, such as the Pharisees with legalism,  trying to &quot;master&quot; theology, being extremely philanthropic etc.  Instead we should desire knowing Him, through a Spirit He gave that doesn&#8217;t destort things but lives in truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I think that the problem is we create our own stumbling blocks for our faith. My point is that Ehrman's extreme form of inerrancy put himself in an untenable position that made it impossible for faith and the Spirit of God to work. Discovering some copying errors and changes to the text due to scribal bias should not be enough to shipwreck our faith in God and the trustworthiness of the Bible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidently it was enough for Ehrman. I think we agree more than not, but it's crucial to recognize that we create doctrines in an attempt to be faithful. Recognizing that some of our doctrines may not be on the mark is not unfaithful. In fact, I think it is very faithful to honestly admit that our faith does not rest on our Bible being perfect, but on the perfection of our Lord and Savior. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope we're not talking past each other here. I think we both agree at the centrality and trustworthiness of the Bible and the danger of departing from the leading of the Spirit. Whereas you have seen many benefits of inerrancy, and there are benefits, I am bringing up the dark side, the side that demands the absolute perfection of the Bible or all is lost to our faith. This is Ehrman's “ehrror.” That doctrine is a fairly recent development and can be harmful because it doesn't put God and his Spirit at front and center, but rather a particular understanding of the Bible that makes it more into a precise, modern historic/scientific text: something that it was not intended to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the problem is we create our own stumbling blocks for our faith. My point is that Ehrman&#8217;s extreme form of inerrancy put himself in an untenable position that made it impossible for faith and the Spirit of God to work. Discovering some copying errors and changes to the text due to scribal bias should not be enough to shipwreck our faith in God and the trustworthiness of the Bible. </p>
<p>Evidently it was enough for Ehrman. I think we agree more than not, but it&#8217;s crucial to recognize that we create doctrines in an attempt to be faithful. Recognizing that some of our doctrines may not be on the mark is not unfaithful. In fact, I think it is very faithful to honestly admit that our faith does not rest on our Bible being perfect, but on the perfection of our Lord and Savior. </p>
<p>I hope we&#8217;re not talking past each other here. I think we both agree at the centrality and trustworthiness of the Bible and the danger of departing from the leading of the Spirit. Whereas you have seen many benefits of inerrancy, and there are benefits, I am bringing up the dark side, the side that demands the absolute perfection of the Bible or all is lost to our faith. This is Ehrman&#8217;s “ehrror.” That doctrine is a fairly recent development and can be harmful because it doesn&#8217;t put God and his Spirit at front and center, but rather a particular understanding of the Bible that makes it more into a precise, modern historic/scientific text: something that it was not intended to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Davidson</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-214</guid>
		<description>If faith is determined by your human understanding and you need to lessen the inerrancy of the Word so that when it doesn't make sense to you, you won't lose it, that isn't faithful by definition.&lt;br /&gt;
Don't you think God knew that there would be different translations through the years? He's perfect and all knowing. He wouldn't create a stumbling block fory our faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If faith is determined by your human understanding and you need to lessen the inerrancy of the Word so that when it doesn&#8217;t make sense to you, you won&#8217;t lose it, that isn&#8217;t faithful by definition.<br />
Don&#8217;t you think God knew that there would be different translations through the years? He&#8217;s perfect and all knowing. He wouldn&#8217;t create a stumbling block fory our faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Davidson</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/06/24/colbert-on-religion/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Intead of deciding to challenge the inerrancy of the Scriptures, why can't we humble ourselves and realize that just because we don't have the capability of understanding it all and that we may never until it is revealed to us by the Spirit even maybe after we die...doesn't mean that God's Word given to us isn't perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
Unless His Word is studied with a heart that is dead to itself and  His Holy Spirit is leading, Satan will use it to bind you. There's a lot that talks in the Bible about faith as a child and to counter that what knowledge can do without love and humility.  Becoming academic with the Word and our relationship to God can really through us back for years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intead of deciding to challenge the inerrancy of the Scriptures, why can&#8217;t we humble ourselves and realize that just because we don&#8217;t have the capability of understanding it all and that we may never until it is revealed to us by the Spirit even maybe after we die&#8230;doesn&#8217;t mean that God&#8217;s Word given to us isn&#8217;t perfect.<br />
Unless His Word is studied with a heart that is dead to itself and  His Holy Spirit is leading, Satan will use it to bind you. There&#8217;s a lot that talks in the Bible about faith as a child and to counter that what knowledge can do without love and humility.  Becoming academic with the Word and our relationship to God can really through us back for years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
