<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hope for Exiles: Preliminary Thoughts on Daniel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/11/29/hope-for-exiles-preliminary-thoughts-on-daniel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/11/29/hope-for-exiles-preliminary-thoughts-on-daniel/</link>
	<description>An imperfect and sometimes sarcastic perspective on following Jesus by Ed Cyzewski.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2006/11/29/hope-for-exiles-preliminary-thoughts-on-daniel/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Good preliminary thoughts, Ed.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has always facinated me about Daniel is the evangelical church&#039;s reliance on it as prophecy of end times events when clearly that section of the book mirrors popular apocalyptic literature (Revelation, anyone?).  I could never understand why the church classified it as part of the &quot;Prophets&quot; when the Jewish Scriptures classified the book as &quot;Literature&quot; (one would think that actual Jews would be best qualified to determine the classification their own writings).  Perhaps this was done because it was assumed that I wasn&#039;t intelligent enough to understand that a later dating (for at least the 2nd half of the book) is probable.  Afterall, how can it be considered the &quot;inspired Word of God&quot; if this was written during God&#039;s &quot;400 silent years&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good preliminary thoughts, Ed.  </p>
<p>What has always facinated me about Daniel is the evangelical church&#8217;s reliance on it as prophecy of end times events when clearly that section of the book mirrors popular apocalyptic literature (Revelation, anyone?).  I could never understand why the church classified it as part of the &quot;Prophets&quot; when the Jewish Scriptures classified the book as &quot;Literature&quot; (one would think that actual Jews would be best qualified to determine the classification their own writings).  Perhaps this was done because it was assumed that I wasn&#8217;t intelligent enough to understand that a later dating (for at least the 2nd half of the book) is probable.  Afterall, how can it be considered the &quot;inspired Word of God&quot; if this was written during God&#8217;s &quot;400 silent years&quot;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: inamirrordimly.com @ 2012-05-21 10:00:26 -->
