<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>:: In.a.Mirror.Dimly :: &#187; Ramadan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inamirrordimly.com/tag/ramadan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inamirrordimly.com</link>
	<description>An imperfect and sometimes sarcastic perspective on following Jesus by Ed Cyzewski.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When We Should Not Debate Theology</title>
		<link>http://inamirrordimly.com/2009/10/27/when-we-should-not-debate-theology/</link>
		<comments>http://inamirrordimly.com/2009/10/27/when-we-should-not-debate-theology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[practical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramadan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inamirrordimly.com/2009/10/27/when-we-should-not-debate-theology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently finished studying the book of Romans, and I can’t shake Romans 14, as well as a few other related verses where Paul tells the Romans to stop fighting over peripheral matters. The challenge it seems is that others would not agree with his assessment that issues such as Jewish laws and customs were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished studying the book of Romans, and I can’t shake Romans 14, as well as a few other related verses where Paul tells the Romans to stop fighting over peripheral matters. The challenge it seems is that others would not agree with his assessment that issues such as Jewish laws and customs were peripheral.</p>
<p>The debates in Rome seemed to center on observing feast days and dietary laws, though Paul was also working on rethinking the role of the law under the new covenant of grace that is accessed through faith. Some believed these Jewish practices were important, while the Gentiles didn’t really have a grid for them. </p>
<p>Paul tells them to make up their own minds on these matters, to live by faith in God, and to trust that God is able to approve or condemn his servants. Under no circumstances should they put a stumbling block in front of other believers by casting them under judgment or doubting that God isn’t able to approve those with whom they disagree.</p>
<p>Am I the only one a little disturbed by this? </p>
<p>I feel like I spend so much time scrutinizing and debating points of theology that may well be peripheral to the big picture of God’s redemptive, Gospel message. Paul isn’t advocating for lazy or bad theology that falls away from the core teachings of the Gospel. He spends plenty of time spelling that out. However, he sees how debates over doctrine can divide believers and cause them to lose focus on their common love and common mission. </p>
<p>On twitter today I ran across an <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/octoberweb-only/143-11.0.html">article on Christianity Today</a> with a series of opinions regarding whether some believers should fast with Muslims for Ramadan. I would usually retweet this on a typical day. This is one of those issues where there are a host of qualifiers added by Christian participants, straw men created by critics, and some well-informed debate from the moderates on both ends of the debate. </p>
<p>However, even if those debating this are well-informed and charitable, is this even a debate worth having? I can see Paul saying “Some fast with Muslims to reach out, while others abstain. Both are living by faith to please God and should be convinced in their own minds by faith. All should leave the judgment to God.” </p>
<p>Maybe I’m just putting words in Paul’s mouth, but after reading Romans 14 I have a feeling that many of the issues I label as “important” may in fact be peripheral issues where grace, trust, and faith must replace arguments and debates. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inamirrordimly.com/2009/10/27/when-we-should-not-debate-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: inamirrordimly.com @ 2012-05-23 17:23:42 -->
